Warnings have been coming from all over the most informative, non-partisan, media sources.  Since the Clinton campaign began, numerous articles and sources have exposed her militant fervor and the “Democrat-flavored” neoconservative circles she runs with.  Not only has she expressed her intent to actually strengthen ties with Israel (as if Israel weren’t already a prime consideration in U.S. foreign policy), but she also threatens to implement the policies of her neoconservative advisers:  expanding war efforts in Syria, ousting Bashar al-Assad, isolating and confronting Iran, and being fully willing to attack Russian forces and assets.  The anti-Russian rhetoric has not been accidental.

With all of the articles from professional journalists, there’s no point to me actually making an article out of this post.  The links herein provide a clear outline and some detail on what we must expect from the likely Clinton Presidency.  At the very beginning, however, I share the first two articles to highlight:

  • US policy is based on war, not on solving problems through economic development.  Compare:  total economic foreign assistance in 2012 was $31 Billion, only 5% of which is used for refugee assistance, while from the 2015 federal budget of $3.8 Trillion, over $600 Billion was spent on the military.  That’s a ratio of 20:1 to maintain a military empire.  Refugee assistance for the millions of refugees, many of whom were created by U.S. wars, is equal to .26% (that’s POINT 2-6 %) of the spending on militancy.
  • Terrorism researcher and University of Chicago Professor Robert Pape has empirically linked terrorism to the US occupation and to the Global War or Terror itself.  The following graph is an example

An article on Robert Pape:

Researcher: Suicide terrorism linked to military occupation

Articles on the Federal Budgets for foreign development and the military:

Penny on the Dollar: US Foreign Aid is about One Percent of Spending

Federal Spending: Where Does the Money Go

The Center for a New American Security, a relatively new think tank, issued a task force study on May 16, co-authored by Robert Kagan and James Rubin, calling for a much more assertive US stance throughout the Middle East.

Old warmongers never die, they just keep writing their memoirs – but now a fresh crop of young Myrmidons is springing from the earth, and these immigrants from Hell are intent on carrying on the fight first taken up by PNAC


Hillary Clinton’s Likely Pentagon Chief Already Advocating for More Bombing and Intervention

Hillary Clinton’s Likely Defense Secretary Wants More US Troops Fighting ISIS and Assad

Hillary Clinton, With Little Notice, Vows to Embrace an Extremist Agenda on Israel

Hillary Is the Candidate of the War Machine

Clinton touts ‘American exceptionalism’ in appeal to Republicans

Revealed: The powerful neocon and military forces behind anti-Russia propaganda

Here is an example of an article written in Foreign Affairs by a known neocon, a leading scholar and propagandist of The Adelson Institute for Strategic Studies

Washington Should Support Rebel Gains

US Hawks Are Using a New UN Report to Call for a Wider War in Syria | The Nation

Another Clinton insider from the Kagan family (there are several)


A video of yesterday’s speech

Hillary Goes Full Reagan In ‘American Exceptionalism’ Speech